The New Way of Things...

One of the big questions many WLP professionals have had of late concerns the pace with which technologies are changing and presenting new options for them, either for development or implementation. Personally, I think that it's futile for those in training and human performance improvement roles to try staying on the bleeding edge. It's not worth it because you can never move fast enough. Cruising LifeHacker today, I came across a NYT article that makes the same point from the perspective of a homeschooling parent.

But the editorial raises another important consideration than simply staying on top of technology. Mr. Kelly highlights the notion that because technological advancement is so rapid now, most people will always be beginners, and that the notion of life-long learning has never been more salient or demanded. This has important implications for workforces around the globe: The only constant is change. The only question is how organizations address that reality.

I've talked about information literacy in the past. The need for technological literacy, as Mr. Kelly notes, is also an obvious and growing requirement as well. It stands to reason that organizations less technologically literate - those that do not learn, apply technology, and evolve - are likely to miss future goals, and worse, be left behind altogether.

How endemic is technology in everything your organization does? Do your organization's professional development plans account for and measure technological literacy?

You Know What They Say About First Impressions...

I'd like to first say Thanks! to Tony Karrer for linking back here.

I was reading Tony's eLearning Technology blog yesterday afternoon, and I saw his post about profile photos and how to use them for professional networking. It's a worthwhile topic, and one that is becoming especially important in the Web 2.0 world, where people across the spectrum of industry and professions seek to stay in touch with colleagues and to expand their opportunity nets for jobs, be they present or future.

The core of the topic is how a simple profile photo, or the lack of one, can convey positive or negative connotations to people making hiring decisions, or at the very least those in a position to take you and your opinions and work seriously. In a reply I posted to this topic thread, I agreed that profile photos on sites like LinkedIn or Facebook, or perhaps in a Ning group or on IM chat, can affect peoples' impressions of you as a person. It's the neverending struggle between sides in the Battle of First Impressions. I made a comment that even one's email address can positively or negatively affect one's chances of getting a job or being taken seriously in professional networking contexts.

My anecdote about a non-professional email address that I use and someone's somewhat negative reaction to it added another dimension to the profile photo question. I think one's email address is probably one of the very first dimensions someone in a position to make decisions about you. It's very acceptable to ask for one's email address about as quickly (perhaps even moreso) than you would ask for their phone number. If I'm a professional in a suit and tie seeking a job with a corporation, and I meet a representative of that corporation either in an interview sense or somewhere in public, I need to be cognizant of what a lowly email address can potentially convey. If my email address is heavymetalshredder@rockthehousedown.com, the person in the position of power may have a personal bias that could alleviate me from consideration almost at the outset. No offense to heavy metal shredding guitarists of course, but the email will betray my otherwise professional (suit and tie) attempts to land a good job.

As is always the case with first impressions, the first one has to be at least good - hopefully memorable - for the job to be landed or the opportunity to be grabbed. And we've all heard of the stories of those losing jobs or job opportunities due to a seedy MySpace page or by Tweeting what they think of the company they just landed a job at. What other possible pitfalls are out there that we might not immediately think about in this respect?

Oh To Be a Kid Again!

While querying the almighty Google this afternoon for the relative position of my blog in its listings (I'm not even in the first 10 pages yet...must modify strategy), I found this gem from 2005. I certainly wish I had such an instructive experience when I was a child, but this raises my confidence in the proliferation of technology to classrooms at every level. Teaching children these technology skills while also teaching them science and math and history will surely do nothing but aid their individual abilities to express themselves in this information age.

My only lasting hope is that the teachers are working the basics of design and interfaces into their art classes at these levels, so we're not treated to a bunch of high school graduates that simply communicate through black text on white PowerPoint slides.

But enough of that. I have to console myself for a few minutes over how old and dinosaurish I feel at the moment. =)